Don't Let a Typo Sink Your Ship: How InvisiRisk BAF Fights The Silent Threat of Typosquatting

In today's fast-paced software development world, efficiency is king. Developers often rely on vast ecosystems of open-source packages to build and enhance their applications. But within this convenience lies a hidden danger: typosquatting. This insidious attack method, where malicious actors upload packages with names that are slight misspellings of popular, legitimate ones, can have devastating consequences. Imagine a single typo leading to malware infiltrating your build system, compromising sensitive data, or even opening backdoors into your production environment. It sounds like a nightmare, but it's a reality that has cost organizations dearly.

At InvisiRisk, we understand these evolving threats. Our Build Application Firewall (BAF) is designed with a robust set of default security policies to protect your applications from various vulnerabilities. But we also believe in empowering our users with the flexibility to create custom policies tailored to their specific needs. Our typosquatting detection policy, built using the powerful Rego language, is a perfect example of how this limitless customizability can safeguard your development pipeline.

The Real Threat: When Typosquatting Strikes

Typosquatting isn't just a theoretical risk; it has caused real damage in the software world. Let's look at some prominent examples:

• The Case of "crossenv": In the npm ecosystem, a malicious package named crossenv (missing the hyphen from the legitimate cross-env) was uploaded. This seemingly innocuous typo led to a package that not only mirrored the functionality of the original but also captured all environment variables, including sensitive credentials like passwords and API keys, and sent them to an attacker's server.

• The "node-hide-console-windows" Rootkit: Another npm incident involved a package named node-hide-console-windows (with an extra "s"), mimicking the legitimate node-hide-console-window. This malicious package downloaded a Discord bot that then facilitated the installation of the r77 rootkit on the victim's system. 

• Recent Large-Scale PyPI Attacks (2024): In March 2024, PyPI was hit by a massive automated typosquatting campaign involving over 500 malicious packages. These packages, with names closely resembling popular libraries like TensorFlow, BeautifulSoup, and requests, were designed to steal personal identifiable information (PII), cryptocurrency wallets, and browser data. The sheer scale of this attack led to the temporary suspension of new users and project creation on PyPI.  

These are just a few examples highlighting the real-world impact of typosquatting attacks. The consequences can range from data breaches and financial losses to reputational damage and severe security compromises.

The Cost of a Typo: More Than Just a Misspelling

A seemingly minor typographical error can open the door to significant risks:

• Malware Installation: Typosquatted packages often contain malicious code designed to steal data, install backdoors, or disrupt systems.  

• Data Exfiltration: Attackers can use these packages to harvest sensitive information like API keys, passwords, and intellectual property.  

• Supply Chain Compromise: If a malicious package makes its way into your application's dependencies, it can potentially affect all your users. 

• Reputational Damage: An attack stemming from a dependency can severely damage your organization's reputation and erode customer trust.  

Prevention is Key: InvisiRisk BAF to the Rescue

InvisiRisk BAF offers a multi-layered approach to securing your build process. Our default security policies provide a strong foundation, covering critical areas like:

• Vulnerability Detection: Identifying and blocking packages with known critical vulnerabilities.

• Untrusted Registry Blocking: Preventing downloads from unverified package registries and source control systems.

• Secret Leak Prevention: Scanning for and blocking the accidental exposure of secrets in your code.

• Git Push Protection: Ensuring secure code commits and preventing unauthorized changes.

• Response Validation: Checking response file sizes, content types, and status codes for anomalies.

How InvisiRisk BAF's Typosquatting Policy Works:

Our policy for typosquatting detection uses a combination of industry trends, advanced heuristics and several other parameters to reliably identify potential typosquats, InvisiRisk BAF can:

• Warn Developers: If a downloaded package name closely resembles a popular one, the policy can trigger a warning, prompting the developer to double-check the package's authenticity.

• Block Downloads: For critical applications or stricter security postures, the policy can be configured to automatically block the download of potential typosquatted packages, preventing them from entering your build environment altogether.

Imagine the scenarios we discussed earlier:

• If a developer accidentally typed requestss instead of requests, InvisiRisk BAF, with the typosquatting policy enabled, would flag this download due to its similarity to the highly popular requests package. The developer would be alerted to the potential typo, preventing the installation of a malicious imposter.

  

  Figure: Sample suspicious package resembling popular package blocked by InvisiRisk BAFs  typosquatting policy.

• During the large-scale PyPI attack in March 2024, InvisiRisk BAF users with a  typosquatting policy focused on popular PyPI packages would have received warnings or blocks when their systems attempted to download the numerous misspelled variations of common libraries.

Unleash the Power of Custom Policies: Limitless Possibilities

We understand that every organization has unique security requirements. That's why InvisiRisk BAF allows you to write custom policies written in REGO. If you can define a security rule, you can likely implement it as a policy within our platform. This empowers your security team to create highly specific and effective controls tailored to your unique risk profile and development workflows.

By combining our default security measures with the flexibility of custom policies, InvisiRisk BAF provides a robust defense against this increasingly prevalent threat.

Conclusion: Secure Your Build, Secure Your Future

Typosquatting attacks are a silent but significant threat in the software supply chain. Relying solely on manual vigilance is no longer sufficient. InvisiRisk BAF, with its comprehensive default security policies and the powerful flexibility of custom policies, provides the proactive protection you need to safeguard your applications and your organization from the costly consequences of a simple typo.

Don't wait for a typo to sink your ship. Learn more about InvisiRisk BAF and how our custom policies can empower your application security today.

Click here to set up a time to see how we can help!